(i) a declaration on the beneficiaries of the plan; The parties should also determine in court the proposed allocation of resolution funds, the settlement manager, the methods of notification to absent class members and the content of the notice. 80 The term “closed class” must be distinguished from “class closure,” which is a related but different term. A closed class refers to a class action on behalf of a limited or identified number of persons who have suffered the loss or harm mentioned in the law. For example, people who have signed a custody or process funding agreement. Class closure is when a member of the court class is required to take positive steps to identify himself as an interest in a judgment or transaction. It is often done to encourage the resolution of procedures. The Court requires regular reporting of the implementation of the transaction (including all stages of the comparison distribution system) and the costs of managing the transaction, in order to ensure that the distribution of transaction allowances between the applicant and class members is as efficient and expediting as possible.139 g) a summary of the terms of the proposed comparison; (k) an explanation of the Court`s authorisation procedure; 97 Prior to the Bundesgerichtshof in Multiplex decision in December 2007 (which authorized the opening of limited class actions for persons who have executed a financing agreement), there were, on average, every 14 months, cases of competing class actions before the Bundesgerichtshof. In the five years following the multiplex, competing class actions were filed every 9.6 months or so in federal court: Vince Morabito, “Clashing Classes Down Under – Evaluating Australia`s Competing Class Actions Through Empirical and Comparative Perspectives” (2012) 27 Connecticut Journal of International Law 205, 274; Money Max Int Pty Ltd v QBE Insurance Group Ltd (2016) 245 FCR 191, 228 . (b) that the amounts to be deducted were calculated according to the terms of the cost agreement and possible dispute settlement agreements.150 87 According to Pt 4A of the Supreme Court Act, a class action may be initiated “some or all” of the class, the result in collective actions that exclude certain potential members of the class. The Supreme Court also has the power, at any stage of the proceedings, at the request of the representative applicant, to authorize the amendment of the motion opening the group action in order to change the description of the group: Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic) ss 33C, 33K. j) if all members of the group are not entitled to transaction benefits – a declaration of non-eligibility and the reasons for that non-eligibility; (a) that appropriate measures have been taken to draw the attention of class members, as soon as possible, to the likelihood of such inferences, so that class members are able, at the appropriate time, to take steps that will enable them to negotiate legal costs or, if necessary, the costs of financing the proceedings , or withdraw from group action; and 12 As noted below in the chapter, class actions brought on an open class basis in Australia are generally not pursued as such: Money Max Int Pty Ltd v. QBE Insurance Group Ltd (2016) 245 FCR 191, 228-9 .